Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,007
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv05034
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01578
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
as 24-3154
Plaintiff: BYRON WILLIS
Defendant: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and SANTOS LUEVANO
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Williams, et al. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 24-2970
Plaintiff: WILLIE WILLIAMS, LADON CLINE and PAUL CONTRERAS
Defendant: J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant: William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff: STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Willis v. United States of America
as 24-2548
Plaintiff: KENTRELL WILLIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Weaver v. Pfeiffer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01162
Petitioner: Willie Weaver
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?