Cases 1 - 10 of 107
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. The Boeing Company et al
as 3:2024cv03367
Plaintiff:
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute doing business as San Jose Neurospine
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois and Does 1 - 3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. United Health Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08697
Counter Claimant:
UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pacificare of Nevada Inc, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Health Net Inc, Health Plan of Nevada Inc, UnitedHealthCare Insurance Company and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Alan Friedman
Counter Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Poehling
Special Master:
Judge Suzanne H. Segal
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09606
Plaintiff:
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Board of Regents of The University System of Georgia and Georgia Institute of Technology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
D.D v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06346
Plaintiff:
D. D.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America Group Benefits Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Payman R. Emmanuel, M.D., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv11798
Plaintiff:
Payman R. Emmanuel, M.D., Inc. D/B/A Orthopedic & Spine Institute of Los Angeles and Payman R. Emmanuel, M.D., Inc. doing business as Orthopedic & Spine Institute of Los Angeles
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Lou v. Accenture United States Group Health Plan et al
as 4:2021cv06741
Plaintiff:
Albert B Lou and Albert B. Lou
Defendant:
Accenture United States Group Health Plan, Accenture LLP, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Stanford Health Care v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc.
as 5:2021cv04598
Plaintiff:
Stanford Health Care
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv09427
Plaintiff:
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute doing business as San Jose Neurospine
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
University of Southern California v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina et al
as 2:2020cv11133
Plaintiff:
University of California on behalf of its Keck Hospital of USC and University of Southern California
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina and Does 1-25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
