Cases 41 - 50 of 1,795
Young v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Mario Tavarous Young
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carden v. Howell et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Michael Howell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Morgan (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodson v. Morgan (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andre Goodson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baggott v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Robert Baggott
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Porch v. McClain (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Deonte Anton Porch
Defendant:
Antonio McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hutchinson v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Hutchinson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lamar et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Dexter Jackson
Defendant:
David Lamar and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heard v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Corey Bernard Heard
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Timothy Melendez
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
