Cases 151 - 160 of 1,371
Allen v. Patel (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00488
Defendant:
Steve Azezzano, Richard Sample, Dr. Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Sharolyn Brantley Montgomery Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Lisenby (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Daryl Bailey, S. A. Lisenby and Wanda J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett, Derrick Cunningham and Yvonne Robinson
Plaintiff:
Alonzo H. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
Chris Waston, William K. Maddox, Chris Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nix v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00372
Defendant:
Lyn Head, Terry G. Davis, Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. The City Police Department of Lanett, AL et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Detective Mitchell, The City Police Department, Ronald Crawley and others
Plaintiff:
Santerio Dushawn Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bossio v. Graham et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Ray Smith, City of Phenix City, Eddie N. Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Bossio and Hector Manuel Bossio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Boatwright et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Russ Gulley, Tom Boatwright and Taylor Watson
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Dees, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
