Cases 111 - 120 of 160
Bentley v. Limestone County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Bentley
Defendant:
Limestone County Detention Facility, Mike Blakely, Brenda Pack and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Scott et al
as 2:2009cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Brooks
Defendant:
Scott, King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Facility and Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bentley v. Limestone County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bentley
Defendant:
Limestone County Jail, Mike Blakey, North Alabama Professional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stokes et al v. Limestone County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00325
Plaintiff:
Mack Samuel Stokes and Jeffery Bentley
Defendant:
Limestone County Jail, Mike Blakey, North Alabama Professional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Allen et al
as 5:2009cv00155
Petitioner:
Jeff Jones
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Russell v. Allen et al
as 5:2009cv00054
Petitioner:
James Phillip Russell
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tice v. King et al
as 5:2009cv00011
Petitioner:
Sammy J. Tice
Respondent:
Troy King, Richard Allen and Bettina Carter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrington v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv02435
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, C Gordy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White et al v. King
as 2:2008cv02275
Plaintiff:
Gary Keith White and Lisa Marie Walker
Defendant:
Brett King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. Pitman et al
as 4:2008cv01560
Plaintiff:
Mateo Perez Perez
Defendant:
Bryan S. Pitman, Alice Martin, Steven T Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
