Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pariti et al v. McGowan et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jay Pariti and Priyanka Pariti
Defendant:
Dr. Kevin McGowan, Allison C. Rioux Kleckner, Tara O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Shandra Morris
Defendant:
Officer Ross, Officer Perry, Chad Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackburn v. Alavest LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
DeCharla Danielle Blackburn
Defendant:
Alavest LLC, Jay Tatum, Kent McPhail & Associates LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Grandview Medical Center et al
as 2:2017cv02185
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Grandview Medical Center, Lefferage Robbins, Jr and Jackie Jay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler et al v. Duke et al
as 2:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Liberty Duke, Christina Crow, Jinks Crow & Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hays v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hays
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama , Chris Curry, Jay Fondren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv03646
Defendant:
Chris Curry , Michael Keith Gay , John Samaniego and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Laine Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hager v. Anniston Planning Commision, City of et al
as 4:2009cv02481
Plaintiff:
K. H. Hager
Defendant:
Anniston Planning Commision, City of, Toby Bennington, Jay Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kilbride v. The United States Government et al
as 4:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Kilbride
Defendant:
The United States Government, Commissioner, United States Treasury Department, Director National Finance Center and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
