Cases 141 - 150 of 2,392
Poe v. Hamm et al
as 5:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sylvester Poe, III
Defendant:
John Hamm, Chad Crabtree, William Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Department of Correction
as 5:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Officer Noble
as 4:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dewayne Brewster
Defendant:
Officer Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. DeKalb County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Fox
Defendant:
DeKalb County Detention Center, Tracy Hamilton, Shalavin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Huntsville, City of
as 5:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Mickey Long
Defendant:
Huntsville, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Thomas
as 2:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Lynnette Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shavers et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Shavers, Sicera Wilkes, Summer Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Defendant:
John Hamm, Kenneth Peters, Deandra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Ronald Odell King
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
