Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Schramm v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Justin Schramm
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Hamm, Thomas Woodfin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Adam Kieth Waldman and Adam Keith Waldman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Hamm, Thomas Woodfin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Mitchel et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Collins
Defendant:
Mitchel, Fox, Gary Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Staton Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Staton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Martel Cordon Robinson
Defendant:
Smith, Christian, Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowder v. Robinson et al (INMATE 2)
as 5:2021cv01535
Plaintiff:
Joshua Crowder
Defendant:
Warden Robinson, Officer Coats and Officer Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Dyette et al
as 5:2021cv01060
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Michael Dyette, Sean Stacy, Files and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isler v. Esties et al
as 5:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Isler, Jr
Defendant:
Wayne Esties, Prem Kumar Gulati, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surles v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Limestone Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Thompkins et al
as 4:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Steve Thompkins, B Robinson, Lt. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
