Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Schultz et al v. Diamond Rubber Products Co
as 2:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Diamond Rubber Products Co
Plaintiff:
Andrea D Conrad, Kasey L Holley, Mitchell S Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Lowe et al
as 4:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Media D C, Tiana Lowe, Philip Anschutz and others
Plaintiff:
Roy S Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. Juul Labs Inc et al
as 6:2019cv01794
Defendant:
Meo Inc, E-Juice Vapor Inc, Shenzhen IVPS Technology Corporation LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Landon May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. C R Bard Inc
as 2:2019cv01112
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Phillips and Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gay v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00685
Defendant:
Beverly Phillips Johnson and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson Gay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Durst v. Enodis Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01305
Defendant:
Jackson WWS Inc and Enodis Corporation
Plaintiff:
Phillip Durst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGee v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 2:2016cv02082
Plaintiff:
Phillip McGee, Sr
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Brown
as 4:2016cv01450
Plaintiff:
Victoria Dawn Phillips
Defendant:
Stacie Annette Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Raybon v. Estes Enterprises, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Raybon
Defendant:
Estes Enterprises, Inc and Phillip Wayne Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02050
Plaintiff:
Harold Banks , Daisy Barnes , Jimmy Battle and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company, LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
