Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Hatcher v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Donell Hatcher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 5:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. NASA et al
as 5:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
NASA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Madison City Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Madison City Police Department, Overton County, TN, Fulton County, GA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Caudle v. Lockheed Martin et al
as 5:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
