Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Greater Birmingham Ministries et al v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
Greater Birmingham Ministries and Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Robert J. Bentley, Luther J Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malone v. Governor of Alabama et al
as 1:2015cv01798
Plaintiff:
Ruben Malone, Jr
Defendant:
Governor of Alabama, Attorney General, Calhoun County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyres-Scholz v. Alabama State County, Tuscaloosa
as 7:2015cv01741
Plaintiff:
Julia Kate Wyres-Scholz
Defendant:
Alabama State County, Tuscaloosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cooner v. Alabama State Bar, The
as 2:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Douglas Howard Cooner
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Percell v. Huntsville Police Department et al
as 5:2014cv01913
Plaintiff:
Keisha J Percell
Defendant:
Huntsville Police Department, Alabama, State of, Huntsville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliff v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01868
Plaintiff:
Arthur I. Radcliff
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Birmingham Board of Education, Craig Weatherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Doe v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2012cv04044
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Alabama, State of and Robert J. Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2011cv03249
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber and Joshua Allen Barber
Defendant:
Alabama, State of , Jefferson County , Alfred Bahakel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
