Cases 111 - 120 of 127
Tatum v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2009cv00868
Petitioner:
Terry Tatum
Respondent:
State of Alabama, St Clair County, Richard Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rose v. St Clair County et al
as 2:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
James Jacob Rose, Jr
Defendant:
St Clair County, Terry Marcum, James Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quaqua v. Hassell
as 4:2009cv00580
Petitioner:
Zaza Tanquillie Quaqua
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Craig Robinson and United States Attorney
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ivory v. Robinson et al
as 2:2008cv02307
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Ivory, .
Defendant:
Harold D Robinson, Fred S Gasbarro, Robert P Barclift and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joshua v. Wright et al
as 2:2008cv02252
Plaintiff:
Randall Bennard Joshua
Defendant:
Sandra Brown Wright and Frank Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Hester et al
as 2:2008cv02169
Plaintiff:
Leonard Robinson
Defendant:
Hester, Richbrugh, Lampley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teah v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv01500
Petitioner:
Neibo Teah
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, David Venturella and others
Miscellaneou:
Craig Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moussa v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv01481
Petitioner:
Amadou Moussa
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Raymond A. Simonse and others
Miscellaneou:
Craig Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gregory v. Robinson et al
as 2:2008cv01392
Plaintiff:
Omahr A Gregory
Defendant:
Robinson, Straittion, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Nesbitt et al
as 3:2008cv01327
Plaintiff:
Maurice Rodriquez Robinson
Defendant:
Lee Nesbitt, Ben Montgomery, Graig Rickman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
