Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,754
Hicks v. Horton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner: Dalton Hicks
Respondent: Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornbuckle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08006
Petitioner: John Hornbuckle
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jacinto v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner: Monica E. Galvan Jacinto
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hartford v. Kilgore
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner: Jimmy Dale Hartford
Respondent: Jimmy Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mosley v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Fredrick Mosley
Defendant: Baker and Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbour v. Cryer et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Trenece L Harbour
Defendant: John Cryer, Marshall Woodward, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08001
Petitioner: Gregory Wade Hughes
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ballard v. Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed (INMATE 4)
as 6:2023cv01754
Plaintiff: Elbert Ballard
Defendant: Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: James L Stone
Defendant: John Hamm and Scotty Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?