Cases 121 - 130 of 10,769
Garcia Jaime v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Mariela Garcia Jaime
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Agho-Allen v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Itohan Agho-Allen
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08003
Petitioner:
Timothy Allen Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lynch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
McArthur Lynch, Jr
Defendant:
Hon. Steve Marshall, John Q. Hamm, Warden Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Holtzclaw et al
as 7:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alvis Young
Defendant:
Malcolm G Holtzclaw, Michael G Underwood and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dalton Hicks
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornbuckle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08006
Petitioner:
John Hornbuckle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jacinto v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Monica E. Galvan Jacinto
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hartford v. Kilgore
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Jimmy Dale Hartford
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
