Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Al-Ameen v. Davenport et al
as 4:2012cv03000
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Ameen
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Joseph H Headley and Debra Gardener
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamble v. Davenport et al
as 4:2012cv02939
Plaintiff:
Jovar Gamble
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Joseph H Headley, Hind and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Bentley et al
as 4:2012cv02124
Plaintiff:
Samuel Nicholson
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withrow v. Bentley et al
as 4:2012cv02123
Plaintiff:
Caleb Withrow
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Bentley et al
as 4:2012cv02087
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randolph Cox
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 4:2012cv01998
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Carter Davenport, Corizen Health and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Thomas et al
as 4:2012cv01695
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Jackson
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tigner v. Wheat et al
as 4:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Arthur Tigner
Defendant:
Wheat, Maxwell Gray, James Marsh and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shack v. Mason et al
as 4:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Shack
Defendant:
John Mason, Carter Davenport and Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv03271
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
