Cases 51 - 60 of 169
Godfrey v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv00736
Petitioner:
Jonathan Godfrey
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Negron v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv00288
Petitioner:
Brandon Negron
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chalmus Wright
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas and Robert Bently
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullock v. Price
as 2:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Bullock
Defendant:
Cheryl Price
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Price et al
as 5:2014cv00065
Petitioner:
Bruce Quillon Carroll
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holley v. Young et al
as 7:2013cv02341
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Plaintiff:
Brian Holley
Defendant:
Jolly Young, Jr., Alabama Department of Corrections, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv02151
Petitioner:
Bryant Bernard Evans
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Price et al
as 1:2013cv01900
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crews-Bey v Price et al
as 2:2013cv01816
Plaintiff:
Kamiles Crews-Bey
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Brian Eskelfnin, Thomas Woodfin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
