Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Maye v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv01137
Plaintiff:
Antwain Maye
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv01068
Petitioner:
Darrow Bernard Payne
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv01008
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Pearson, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maye et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00960
Plaintiff:
Antwain Maye and Michael Pearson
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, Charles Willis and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Binder et al
as 2:2010cv00597
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Joe Binder, Michael Strickland and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Campbell et al
as 2:2010cv00507
Petitioner:
Lanorris Woods
Respondent:
Donal Campbell, Gary Hetzel and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel and John Authur
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Hanna v. Hetzel et al
as 5:2010cv00376
Petitioner:
Rodney O'Neal Hanna
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Gary Hetzel, et al
as 4:2010cv00378
Petitioner:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodman v. Hetzell
as 1:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
Clyde Goodman
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
