Cases 51 - 60 of 10,769
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mcneal
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erramraju v. Blount County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ramaraju Rom Erramraju
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mark Moon, Blount County Jail Medical Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henley v. Calloway et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Nikita Roland Henley
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fasold v. Blount County Jail
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Isiah Matthew Fasold
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Jefferson County Clerks Office et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Preston Kennedy Lee
Defendant:
Jefferson County Clerks Office, Jacqueline Anderson Smith and Joey Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
