Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McCall v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Akevious McCall
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Regional Fugitive Task Force, Alabama Bureau of Investigation and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00446
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Federal Dept of Justice, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Hoover City Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
Federal Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Hoover City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Monroe, Alabama
as 5:2018cv00963
Petitioner:
Leon McCall
Respondent:
Monroe, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parmeley v. Hoover City Municipal et al
as 2:2016cv01534
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Defendant:
Hoover City Municipal, Hoover City Jail, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. McCall et al
as 2:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
McCall, Leigh and Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00475
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Hoover City of et al
as 2:2013cv01232
Plaintiff:
Homero Martinez, Jr
Defendant:
Hoover City of, Graves, Andre Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
