Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Glasscock v. Current Commissioner ADOC et al
as 2:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Morris Glasscock
Defendant:
Current Commissioner ADOC, Jo Woods, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Calloway, et al
as 5:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dewayne Gray and Stephen Dewyane Gray
Defendant:
Rhonda Calloway, Sgt. Morris, Sgt. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Hoover, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01626
Petitioner:
Baxter A Powell and Brother Bisnali R. A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Hoover, City of, Hoover Police Department, Hoover Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Voss et al
as 2:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Scottie Lamar Jennings
Defendant:
Matthew Voss, Page, Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Rogers
as 2:2021cv00306
Defendant:
Morris L Rogers
Plaintiff:
Desmond Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardwell v. Johnson
as 4:2019cv00638
Plaintiff:
Billy Morris Cardwell
Defendant:
Julian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
