Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Quick v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2012cv02253
Plaintiff:
Patricia Quick
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011mc00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Quick et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Yvette Quick , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin et al v. Muscletech Research and Development Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02093
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Austin , Joselyn Hardwick , Heather Pyle and others
Defendant:
Muscletech Research and Development Inc, Iovate Health Sciences USA Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Research Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quick v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Quick
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quick v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01048
Plaintiff:
Andrea D. Quick
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Med Urological, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Quick v. Carter et al
as 5:2009cv00950
Petitioner:
Robbie Quick
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
