Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Barley v. Barry et al
as 7:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley
Defendant:
Angela Barry, Lawrence Edmund, S Thurman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Cornerstone Civil Contractors LLC et al
as 7:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant:
Cornerstone Civil Contractors LLC , Edmund H Colgrove, Jr , Candace J Colgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Christopher Murphy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 2:2012cv01742
Plaintiff:
Edmund Payne and Christine Payne
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clegg v. Crackel
as 5:2011cv04186
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Clegg
Defendant:
Edmund A. Crackel, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv03682
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Charles R McLone, John H England, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavender v. McMillian et al
as 4:2011cv02669
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Bernard Lavender
Defendant:
Dennis McMillian and Edmund M Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Charles R. Malone, John H. England, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Sexton
as 7:2011cv01237
Plaintiff:
Ruben Arcadio Ramirez
Defendant:
Edmund Ted Sexton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
