Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Thompson v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Randolph Thompson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McBee v. Estes
as 5:2015cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBee v. Daniels et al
as 5:2014cv02308
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Daniels and Limestone Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBee v. A.D.O.C. Classification et al
as 5:2014cv01221
Petitioner:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Respondent:
A.D.O.C. Classification, Central Records Office and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01218
Petitioner:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Respondent:
Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Dorothy Goode, Jimmy Patrick and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph County Water, Sewer and Fire Protection Authority, Inc. v. Crom Corporation, The
as 1:2013cv01724
Plaintiff:
Randolph County Water, Sewer and Fire Protection Authority, Inc.
Defendant:
Crom Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 2:2013cv00783
Plaintiff:
Randolph Evans and Angela Evans
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parker v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv03503
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wayne Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Willie Thomas, John Hutton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
