Cases 21 - 30 of 1,665
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IGTECH LLC et al v. Excell Communications Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
IGTECH LLC and United Cable Services LLC
Defendant:
Excell Communications Inc, Altice USA Inc and New York City Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felder v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Felder
Defendant:
Kevin Moore and Birmingham, Alabama, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gregory et al v. Trussville, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory, Amy Gregory and Gavin Gregory
Defendant:
Trussville, Alabama, City of, Eric Rush, James McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClendon v. City of Huntsville
as 5:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Beth McClendon
Defendant:
City of Huntsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
