Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Pippen v. Bentley et al
as 6:2014cv01787
Plaintiff: Samuel Pippen
Defendant: Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01774
Plaintiff: Jon Johnson
Defendant: Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Tuscaloosa County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv01622
Plaintiff: Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant: Tuscaloosa County, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County District Attorney Office and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewlett v. Shaffer et al
as 6:2014cv01384
Plaintiff: Michael A Hewlett
Defendant: Scotty R Shaffer, Robert Danford, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01350
Plaintiff: Alfonte Bailey
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Corizon Medical Services and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01313
Petitioner: Charles Randall Stewart
Respondent: Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Metcalf v. Agee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv01196
Plaintiff: Ivan Quintel Metcalf
Defendant: Agee, Gene Mitchel, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff: Roy Burns
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01157
Plaintiff: A. M.
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Dewayne Estes
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01161
Plaintiff: E.M.
Defendant: Kim Thomas and Dewayne Estes
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?