Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Techota LLC v. CP Home Care Vance LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2018cv00317
Plaintiff: Techota LLC
Defendant: CP Home Care Vance LLC , Pacrim US (AL) LLC , Pacrim U.S. LLC and others
Counter_defendant: Phyllis J. Robertson, Shannon Hendon, Jeff Bauer and others
Counter_claimant: CP Home Care Vance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Robertson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv01597
Plaintiff: Wilma Robertson
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01471
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Robertson
as 5:2017cv00214
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: Kenneth E Robertson
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corkren et al v. Robertson
as 6:2017cv00166
Plaintiff: Eddie Mack Corkren and Sophie Corkren
Defendant: Roy Harold Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robertson et al v. Arbor Place Condominium Association Inc
as 2:2016cv01619
Plaintiff: Bonnie Robertson and Scott Robertson
Defendant: Arbor Place Condominium Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Steen-Eddins v. Robertson
as 2:2016cv00928
Plaintiff: Willie Steen-Eddins
Defendant: Lauren Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robertson v. Kardashian
as 2:2016cv00827
Plaintiff: Daniel Matthew Robertson
Defendant: Armen Kardashian
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?