Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Goodman v. Hetzell
as 1:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
Clyde Goodman
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradford v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Bradford
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, Pritchett Towing Service, Randall Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Calhoun County Task Force et al
as 1:2008cv01950
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Bradford
Defendant:
Calhoun County Task Force, Jason Campbell, Andy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allums et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv01621
Plaintiff:
Paul Clayton Allums, Hurd L Barnes, Billy Gene Beard, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Goodman v. Clemmons
as 2:2008cv01274
Plaintiff:
Clyde Goodman
Defendant:
J Clemmons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2008cv01101
Plaintiff:
Clyde C. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Forman v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv01098
Plaintiff:
Darryl Connell Forman
Defendant:
Clyde Jones and Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Land, Jackson County, et al
as 5:2007cv01082
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Land, Jackson County and Betty Clyde Thomas
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831 dd - Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
