Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Jackson v. Riley et al
as 2:2009cv01997
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jordan Jackson
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Gary Hetzel, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Richard F. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv01983
Plaintiff:
Clark Davis
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Gary Hetzel, Wallace Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Hetzell et al
as 6:2009cv01958
Petitioner:
Ronny Horton
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hetzell et al
as 2:2009cv01877
Petitioner:
Christopher Jordan Jackson
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Hetzell et al
as 5:2009cv01833
Petitioner:
Willie Thomas Burton
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv01443
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, Bernard McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2009cv00617
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Swift
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Christopher Gordy, Greg Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jessie v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv00327
Plaintiff:
Billy Jessie
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, Arthur and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2009cv00319
Petitioner:
Kirby Lashawn Tate
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malec v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Charles C Malec
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, Bernard McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
