Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Remington Arms Company LLC
as 5:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Lyons et al v. Saeilo Inc D/B/A Kahr Arms
as 5:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Donald Lyons and Jillian Lyons
Defendant:
Saeilo Inc D/B/A Kahr Arms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Remington Arms Company LLC
as 2:2019cv01891
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Scott, II
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pannell v. Remington Arms Co LLC
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Remington Arms Co LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert C Pannell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 4:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency, A. Smith & wesson 422 22-Caliber Pistol, A Weihrauch Hermann HW7 22-Caliber Revolver and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Steyr Arms Inc v. Sig Sauer Inc
as 2:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steyr Arms Inc
Defendant:
Sig Sauer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Steyr Arms Inc v. Beretta USA Corp
as 2:2015cv01718
Plaintiff:
Steyr Arms Inc
Defendant:
Beretta USA Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Vickery v. Remington Arms Company Inc et al
as 7:2012cv03926
Plaintiff:
Wil A Vickery
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sewell v. Smith & Wesson Holding Corp et al
as 4:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sewell
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Holding Corp , Thompson/Center Arms Company Inc and Shotgun Sports Supply Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EBSCO Industries, Inc., v. Thompson/Center Arms Company, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01744
Plaintiff:
EBSCO Industries, Inc.,, Modern Muzzleloading, Inc. and Plastic Research & Development Corp.
Defendant:
Thompson/Center Arms Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
