Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson et al v. Woodside Condominium et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
John Harmon, Patricia Moore, Katherine L Johnson and others
Defendant:
Bill Peoples, Alcion Paul, Kenneth E Haeuser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Bessemer, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2015cv02371
Plaintiff:
Latunja Johnson
Defendant:
Bessemer, Alabama, City of , Nathaniel Rutledge, Jr. , Karrie Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenwich Investors XLVI REO LLC v. Burch and Hatfield Formal Shops Inc
as 7:2014cv02273
Plaintiff:
Greenwich Investors XLVI REO LLC
Defendant:
Burch and Hatfield Formal Shops Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burch v. Thomas et al
as 7:2014cv01812
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edward Burch
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, III, V. Richardson, John Hutton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Downs v. Mr. Burch Formal Wear Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Downs
Defendant:
Mr. Burch Formal Wear Incorporated and Wayne A. Burch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Burch Corporation v. McStay
as 2:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Burch Corporation
Defendant:
Aubrey McStay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
