Cases 1 - 10 of 1,665
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Avery v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Wathaw Avery
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billingham v. City of Florence Alabama et al
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Victor Billingham
Defendant:
City of Florence Alabama and Asplundh Tree Expert LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Midfield, City of
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Russell
Defendant:
Midfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez et al v. Warren et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lopez, Guadalupe Dominquez and Tomas Alvarez
Defendant:
Wirt Warren, WFGC Inc doing business as Warren Family Garden Center & Nursery, R&W Tire City INC doing business as East Lake Tire Center and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortiz v. Angel et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ortiz
Defendant:
Edgar A Angel, Andrew T Posten and Alabaster, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
