Cases 1 - 10 of 2,090
Montgomery v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
James Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Montgomery v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Julia Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Berger v. 22nd State Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
The State of Alabama
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
22nd State Bank, Christopher Watkins, FEB Bancshares Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell et al v. Selma City Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Mitchell, Sr. and Latonya Mines
Defendant:
Selma City Board of Education and Stoney Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemons v. Mobile County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Chafarrah Clemons
Defendant:
Mobile County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herrmann et al v. Nata et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sara Herrmann and Melissa Hera
Defendant:
Jodie Nata, Stephanie Paul, Bernadette Dees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mickles v. Walmart
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
State of Alabama v. Scully
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger and State of Alabama
Defendant:
Defacto Judge William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
