Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Gossett v. Davidson et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
James Gossett
Defendant:
J Davidson and Luke Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brouillette v. Mobile County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Mobile County District Attorney's Office, Ashley Rich, Keith Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins v. Conecuh County, Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Nakita Robbins
Defendant:
Conecuh County, Alabama, Randy Brock, James Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins et al v. James Ward et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brandi Wiggins and Sameria Straughn
Defendant:
James Ward, Randy Brock and Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackmon v. Perkins
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Huey David Blackmon
Defendant:
James Perkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Blackmon v. Perkins
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Huey David Blackmon
Defendant:
James Perkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Montgomery v. Stewart
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
James Stewart, Walmart Supercenter and Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Braxton et al v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick and others
Defendant:
Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
