Cases 181 - 190 of 3,351
James v. Pettway et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Pettway and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arso v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00256
Petitioner:
Bireka Arso
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Headley et al
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Hart, II
Respondent:
Joseph H. Headley, Baldwin Circuit Court and State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Steele et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Labarron Dewayne Hall and LaBarron Dewayne Hill
Defendant:
William H. Steele, S. Mitcell McRae, John Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Billy
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Grimes Jedd Jackson and Jedd Jackson Grimes
Defendant:
Steve Billy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. USA
as 1:2022cv00269
Petitioner:
Tarrence Dramon Tolbert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. Hetrick
as 1:2022cv00260
Petitioner:
Donal R. Edwards
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodyard v. King et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Captain Antonio McClain and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Vincent Burch
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Officer Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Coale
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
James Eric Coale, Steve Billy and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
