Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,356
Johnson v. Keith et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff: Michael M. Johnson
Defendant: Chris Keith and Julian A. Savannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff: Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCuien v. Peters
as 1:2024cv00172
Petitioner: Elante Javonne McCuien
Respondent: Ken Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Derrick Florence
Defendant: Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orso v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Defendant: Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: William Bart Huey
Defendant: Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner: Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?