Cases 51 - 60 of 3,357
Wright v. USA
as 1:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Quacy Tom Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sumpter v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Anthony Sumpter and Lajuan Sumpter
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and Officer Nickols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Burch
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Ms. Jackson, Sam Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Alabama v. Pugh
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
John Riley Donald
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gordon v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Justin Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Pamela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrine v. Folks
as 1:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
Antonio Herrine
Respondent:
Sharon Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. USA
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
