Cases 1 - 10 of 4,197
Baker v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Benny Gibson Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Crosby v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawn Crosby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woodell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodell, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Arthur James
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Delman Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Starr v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Mary Starr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Zell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rebecca D Zell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Green v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Heather S Green
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Isiah A Watson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Strange v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Strange
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
