Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Moran et al v. Pardo
as 2:2023mc00005
Plaintiff:
H. Thomas Moran, Life Partners, Inc. and LPI Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Pardo
Eckert v. Jarden Corporation, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02132
Defendant:
Jarden Corporation, LLC, Newell Brands Inc. and Jarden
Plaintiff:
Dan H. Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts et al v. Watts et al
as 2:2019cv02066
Defendant:
Daniel Shue, Sydney Ann Watts, Kristopher Koelemay and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Lopez and Edward Allan Watts
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hensley et al v. Kemp et al
as 4:2019cv04002
Plaintiff:
George Wesley Hensley and Daniel Hensley
Defendant:
Timmy Jay Hensley, Cody Wayne Hensley and Karlton H. Kemp, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hensley v. Kemp et al
as 4:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
George Wesley Hensley
Defendant:
Karlton H. Kemp, Jr., Cody Wayne Hensley and Timmy Jay Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv04153
Plaintiff:
Nathan F Austin
Defendant:
S Robson Walton , Michael T Duke , H Lee Scott, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duvall et al v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv02141
Plaintiff:
Paul David Duvall , William S. Womble , Carl R. Moore and others
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 415 Windfall Elimination Provision
gail v. Morrison et al
as 5:2013cv05075
Plaintiff:
paula gail
Defendant:
H. Keith Morrison , Elly Parizek , Tami Couchot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Betham v. Fischer
as 3:2013cv03007
Plaintiff:
Wayne H. Betham
Defendant:
Dave Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Emory v. Duke et al
as 5:2012cv05171
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
