General Cases filed in the US District Court for the District of Arizona Before Judge Jennifer Guerin
Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Shook v. Apker
as 4:2010cv00264
Petitioner: Paul Edward Shook, Jr
Respondent: Lionel C Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harvey v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00207
Petitioner: Michael Laurence Harvey
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00189
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Barnes, Jr.
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yazzie v. Apker
as 4:2010cv00034
Petitioner: Daniel Bryant Yazzie
Respondent: Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jebril v. Graber We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00002
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lundell v. Apker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00720
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boderas v. Graber
as 4:2009cv00698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Olivera-Miro v. Ryan et al
as 4:2009cv00521
Petitioner: Erick Olivera-Miro
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMorrow v. Unknown Party
as 4:2009cv00450
Petitioner: Patrick McMorrow
Respondent: Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mach v. Ryan et al
as 4:2009cv00420
Petitioner: William Chapman Mach
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?