Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grant Cochran et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv09612
Plaintiff:
Grant Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CRANE CO. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY);, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James O Rourke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv04884
Plaintiff:
Joan O'Rourke, James O'Rourke, James O Rourke and others
Defendant:
Fairbanks Morse Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Debtor In Possession:
Hill Brothers Chemical Company, Inc. and IMO Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Bill Haviland v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc et al
as 2:2016cv09503
Defendant:
AT and T Corp., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Haviland
Jack W. Burt, Jr. et al v. AVCO Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv03355
Defendant:
AVCO Corporation, Bell Helicopter Textron Inc, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Burt and Jack W. Burt, Jr.
Bruce Bell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv07341
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bell
Ued Individually And As Successor-interest To Owens-Illinois Glass Company:
O-I Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Owens Illinois Glass Company:
Owens Illinois Inc
Ued Individually And Successor-in-interest To Sacoma-Sierra Inc:
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Quimby Pump Company Inc:
Warren Pumps LLC
James Lester David et al v. Aladdin Heating Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv06052
Defendant:
3M Company, Aladdin Heating Corporation, Albay Construction Company and others
Movant:
Dana Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Lester David and Rebecca Lee David
Marion Cherry et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01745
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Cherry and Marion Cherry
The:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Walter Nielsen et al v. AECOM Technology Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv04270
Ued As Successor To Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall Aka DMJM:
AECOM Technology Corporation
Ued As Successor-by-merger To ARMCO Drainage And Metal Product:
ARMCO Steel Corporation
Defendant:
AVCO Corporation, Aerojet General Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals Inc and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Calaveras Cement Company:
Lehigh Southwest Cement Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Martin Marietta Company Sbm The Glenn L Martin Co:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff:
Arleen Nielsen and Walter Nielsen
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Sperry Rand Co Sbm To Remington-Rand Co:
UNYSIS Corporation
Glenn et al v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv06007
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Glenn, Gwendolyn Glenn, Gwendolyn Glenn and others
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
