Cases 81 - 90 of 24,153
Rogelio Soto v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02709
Petitioner:
Rogelio Soto
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Ray Armijo v. Edward Borla
as 8:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Armijo
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julio Espinoza Preciado v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02663
Plaintiff:
Julio Espinoza Preciado
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adrian Solorio v. C. Pfeiffer
as 8:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Adrian Solorio
Respondent:
C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cody Adam Julian v. Edward J. Borla
as 2:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
Cody Adam Julian
Respondent:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernardo Josefin Andres v. United States District Court CA
as 2:2024cv01429
Petitioner:
Bernardo Josefin Andres
Respondent:
United States District Court CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
