Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NXP USA, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01810
Plaintiff:
NXP USA, Inc.
Defendant:
MediaTek Inc., MediaTek USA Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mediatek Inc. et al v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv04969
Defendant:
NXP USA, Inc., Denso Ten America Limited, NXP Semiconductors N.V. and others
Plaintiff:
MediaTek USA Inc. and Mediatek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mediatek Inc. et al v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv04970
Defendant:
NXP USA, Inc., NXP Semiconductors N.V., Arrow Electronics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MediaTek USA Inc. and Mediatek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Broadcom Corporation v. MediaTek Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
Broadcom Corporation
Defendant:
MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc.
Palmchip Corporation v. Ralink Technology Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv01567
Defendant:
MediaTek Inc, MediaTek USA Inc, Ralink Technology Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Palmchip Corporation
Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C. v. Denon Electronics (USA), L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv04370
Counter Defendant:
Acacia Patent Acquisition LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Creative Labs, Inc., Denon Electronics (USA), L.L.C., Epson America, Inc. and others
Unknown:
Lisa R Strauss, Edward Alexander Marshall, Richard A Mitchell and others
Interested Party:
DIVX, Inc., Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, MPEG LA, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Epson America, Inc., Funai Corporation, Onkyo U.S.A. Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C.
Shop4tech.com v. E-Top Mediatek Inc et al
as 5:2007cv01489
Plaintiff:
Shop4tech.com and Shop4tech.com
Defendant:
E-Top Mediatek Inc, Sapido Technology Inc, Future World Tech Co and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
