Cases 31 - 40 of 99
James Carroll et al v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Company, ZF Friedrichshafen AG, ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Md Ullah, Eldon Painter and James Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
California Fair Plan v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2019cv00615
Defendant:
Does 1-50, inclusive, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Home Depot USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
California Fair Plan Association and California Fair Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Janice Huskey v. Behr Process Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01374
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Behr Paint Corp., Masco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Huskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matin Shalikar v. Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv02713
Defendant:
Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Panvini and Matin Shalikar
Craya C. Caron v. Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc et al
as 8:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Craya C. Caron
Defendant:
Does, Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc and Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC
Meagan Chamberlain et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02046
Plaintiff:
Aurelie Brown, Meagan Chamberlain, Laura Lane and others
Defendant:
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
Oscar Herrera v. LG Electronics USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01039
Defendant:
Does, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Oscar Herrera
Sandy Hafer v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Sandy Hafer
Defendant:
Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
Mohammad Daboussi v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08049
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Daboussi
Defendant:
Does and Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.
Leslie Cochrane v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2016cv01679
Plaintiff:
Leslie Cochrane
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
