Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Tom Blake v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv02457
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tom Jon Rilurcasa v. David Phillips
as 2:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Tom Jon Rilurcasa
Respondent:
David Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hellasandros v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2021cv05806
Plaintiff:
Santana Hellasandros
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, Brian Hill, Clifford Anderson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tom Mark Franks v. RC Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv01262
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, RC Johnson and B. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Tom Mark Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tom Franklin Morris v. Roberto Ortiz et al
as 2:2021cv00582
Defendant:
2 unknown names, Jaspal Dhaliwal, unknown name and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Franklin Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrod Gordon v. Riverside Transit Agency et al
as 5:2020cv02424
Defendant:
Stephine Sirls, Jane Doe 1, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tom Mark Franks v. R C Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv05343
Defendant:
Bernard Ramos, K-Clark Kelso, R C Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Mark Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Floyd et al v. Pittsburgh Bureau of Police et al
as 2:2020cv05153
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Governor Tom Wolf and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, Frederick Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tom M. Franks v. R.C. Johnson
as 2:2020cv04635
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tom M. Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruthellen Sheflin et al v. Margaret Scherin et al
as 2:2020cv02265
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Andrews, Thomas Earl Andrews, T. Earl Andrews and others
Defendant:
Margaret Scherin, Dose, Skornia Law Group LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
