Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Faramarz Naeim v. Robert L. Wilkie et al
as 2:2019cv06126
Defendant:
Secretary ROBERT L. WILKIE, MICHAEL LEWIS, Acting Director ROBERT W. MCKENRICK and others
Plaintiff:
Faramarz Naeim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
R. Alexander Acosta v. Fernando Pinedo Garcia
as 2:2019cv05230
Defendant:
Fernando Pinedo d/b/a Healthy Harvesting, Fernando Pinedo Garcia and Fernando Pinedo Garcia doing business as Healthy Harvesting
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Rivas et al v. RDV Construction, Inc.
as 2:2016cv03314
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
RDV Construction, Inc. and Juan Rivas
Rosemarie Pesci v. Erik K Shinseki et al
as 5:2015cv00607
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Robert McDonald, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Erik K Shinseki and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Pesci
Thomas E Perez v. G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan et al
as 2:2015cv00391
Defendant:
G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, Procyon Technologies, Inc., Lee Schuh and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Thomas E. Perez v. Oxnard Manor LP et al
as 2:2014cv01490
Defendant:
Oxnard Manor LP and Steven Rieder
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Secretary of Labor v. Bristol Warner Plaza LLC
as 8:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor and Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
Bristol Warner Plaza LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Glenn Tibble et al v. Edison International et al
as 2:2007cv05359
Plaintiff:
Glenn Tibble, Glenn Tibble, William Bauer and others
Defendant:
Edison International, The Edison International Benefits Committee, Edison International Trust Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
