Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Anthony Conners v. Kathy et al
as 2:2019cv07147
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02907
Defendant:
SERVPRO Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Ricky Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deborah Conner Scott v. Hayworth House, LP et al
as 2:2018cv10085
Defendant:
HDSI Management, Inc. and Hayworth House, LP
Plaintiff:
Deborah Conner Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jane Doe J.L. et al v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2018cv06115
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe K.M., Betsayda Aceituno, Jane Doe S.A. and others
Defendant:
University of Southern California, George Tyndall and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. Servpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03095
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Defendant:
SEREVPRO Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Servpro Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02906
Defendant:
SERVPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. and Richard Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Raymond Conner v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00504
Plaintiff:
Raymond Conner
Defendant:
Does, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. and Wolseley Investments, Inc.
Nicholas Conner v. Rash Curtis and Associates
as 2:2017cv06520
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Conner
Defendant:
Rash Curtis and Associates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
