Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
Core Optical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-10, AT and T, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillip Andrew Craemer Estate v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 2:2020cv10833
Plaintiff:
Phillip Andrew Craemer Estate
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10091
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Gonzales et al v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv08299
Plaintiff:
Michael Ralston, Ronald Flores, Norbeto Alarcon and others
Defendant:
Sting Funez, Charter Communications, Inc., Artur Kosinski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Ivan Soto v. Charter Communications Holdings Company, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06459
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Inc., Charter Communications Holdings Company, LLC, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
