Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, E. MARTIN ESTRADA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv07065
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carl Jensen et al
as 2:2021cv06817
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Carl Jensen, Stephen W. Gold, Kerry Margolis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Tonya Lee Hocking v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2020cv02447
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lee Hocking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morgan and Sampson USA v. The Oneida Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01551
Plaintiff:
MORGAN & SAMPSON USA and Morgan and Sampson USA
Defendant:
THE ONEIDA GROUP, INC., ANCHOR HOCKING, LLC and DOES 1 through 40, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Edward Hocking et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2019cv04374
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hocking and Edward Hocking
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Cappo Management XXIX, Inc. doing business as Harrold Ford, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Hocking v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2016cv02611
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Charles Hocking
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
