Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02361
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02298
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08799
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08402
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09884
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Romulo Hidaldo Flores v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al
as 5:2011cv00840
Petitioner:
Romulo Hidaldo Flores
Respondent:
Homeland Security and Immigration and Naturalization Service
Zephyrinus Chiedu Egbuonu v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv05984
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Christine Davis, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Zephyrinus Chiedu Egbuonu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Francisco Castro Lopez et al v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service et al
as 2:2008cv01875
Petitioner:
Francisco Castro Lopez
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and United States Homeland Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Cyrus Haroonian v. Homeland Security et al
as 2:2008cv01569
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Haroonian
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Nahideh Harooni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Egbuonu Zephyrinus v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv06765
Petitioner:
Egbuonu Zephyrinus
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Christine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
