Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stephanie Sarley v. Chinsea Linda Lee et al
as 2:2022cv07711
Defendant:
Chinsea Linda Lee, UMG Recordings, Inc., Shenseea and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Sarley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maggy Garabedian et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04391
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Adams, Flora Agee, Patricia Alexander and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05985
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kathy L. Nagie et al v. HSBC North America Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05515
Plaintiff:
Esmerita Alvarez, Hector D. Alvarez, Jr., Tina T. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Does, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Finance Corporation and others
Linda Lee Startup v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 8:2013cv00541
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Startup
Unniebe Solomon et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
Allyson Allen, Ethel Caroleen Allen, Earmedine Armfield and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Francis Walter Startup et al v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01961
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Jamie Dimon, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Walter Startup and Linda Lee Startup
Linda Lee Smith v. Dawn Davison
as 2:2009cv04683
Petitioner:
Linda Lee Smith and Linda Lee Smith
Respondent:
Dawn Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
